Articles
Reviews
Aim & Scope
The aim of the journal is to announce offering of national and international scientific environment and share high quality research studies, case studies and reviews conducted in the field of anesthesia, pain medicine, intensive care and surgical sciences both in Turkey and abroad; and to contribute to the development of scientific communication by establishing a continuous educational platform.
Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences (J Cukurova Anesth Surg ) is published online three times a year (April, August, December). Special or supplement series may also be published where necessary. Manuscripts submitted to the journal are evaluated by independent peer reviews according to double blind peer review system. Scientifically reviewed manuscripts can be freely accessed through the internet without financial, legal and technical barriers. These manuscripts can be read, downloaded, copied, distributed, printed, scanned, linked to full texts, indexed, transferred as data to the software and used for any legal purpose. Authors and copyright owners agree that all users have free access.
Writing Rules
Please read the spelling rules and publication principles before submitting your article.
This journal embraces open publishing and access policies.
All articles are offered under a CC license and are openly accessible. Authors must agree to the terms of open access.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cover Page: The title should be simple and understandable (in Turkish and English). Name, surname and title of all authors, the name and city of the institution they work for should be included on this page. The name, address, telephone, fax, mobile phone and e-mail information of the author should also be added to this page.
On the first page of the article file, only the author information and, if applicable, the related notes should be found on the first page of the article. Article text should start from the second page.
The abstract should have a maximum length of 250 words. The Objective should include Materials and Methods, Results and Conclusion. Keywords with at least 3 (three) words should be written with a space between the abstract.
Research article format; Introduction, material and method, findings, discussion and conclusion
Case presentation format; Introduction, case report, history, tests, progress, treatment and outcome, discussion-literature review, recommendations
References
The authors themselves are responsible for the accuracy of the resources.
References should be written on a separate page and should be numbered according to the order of transition.
If the name is not given in the sentence, the source number should be given in superscript before the point sign.
Example: (-------- is used in prophylaxis21.)
Example: (---------------- Fields ve ark.28 sağlıklı, kilolu ve obez adolesanlarda----------------)
Year, volume, start and end pages should be given in journal sources, but only the year should be stated in book sources.
Example: (Sinclair DR, Chung F, Mezei G. Can postoperative nausea and vomiting be predicted? Anesthesiology. 1999; 91: 109-18)
Example: (Malagelada J-R, Malagelada C. Nausea and vomiting.): 10S ed, Feldman M, Freidman LS, Brandt LJ (Eds).
If there are more than two consecutive sources, the first and last ones should be given a "-" sign:
Example: (-------ihtiyatla hareket etme eğilimi olarak tanımlanmıştır1-3.)
References should contain the full surnames of the authors and the first letters of their names.
Example: (Ilgınel MT, Tunay DL, Güneş Y. Epilepside perioperatif yönetim ve anestezi. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi. 2018;27:39-69.)
If the number of writers in the source is 3 or less, all authors should be mentioned. the source should be written.
Example: (Koivuranta M, Läärä E, Snåre L, et al. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesia. 1997; 52: 443-9.)
Journal names should be shortened according to Pubmed.
Example: (Br J Anaesth., Anesth Analg., J Pharmacol Sci.)
Authors are responsible for the correctness of references and spelling.
Manuscripts and punctuation marks must comply with the following examples.
The source is a magazine;
The author should be written in full capitalization, and the first name should be written as first letter and larger. Title of article. The journal is abbreviated to Index Medicus. Year: Volume: First page number-Last page number
Example: (Ilgınel MT, Tunay DL, Güneş Y. Epilepside perioperatif yönetim ve anestezi. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi. 2018;27:39-69.)
If the source is a book;
Name (s) of the surname of the author (s). The name of the book. What is the pressure? Publication Place: Printing House, Publication Year.
Example: (Ropper AH, Brown RH. Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology. 8th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2007.)
If a chapter from the book was used as a source;
Name (s) of the surname of the chapter author (s). Section title. The name of the book. What is the pressure? (First name and last name (s) of ed and Eds. Editor (s): First page number-last page number of the section. Printing place, Publisher, Year of printing.
Example: (Phillips MK, Gain P. Hypertension and stroke. Hypertension: Pathophysiology and Management, 2nd ed (Eds JH Laragh, BM Brenner): 495-8. London, Ran Press, 1985.)
If the website is shown as source;
The name of the Web site. (accessed date)
Sample:
World Health Organization (WHO).
Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ Access date: 15Position2017.)
The source thesis is;
First name of the author's surname. Title of the thesis (thesis). Name of the city, University name (if university), Year.
Example: (Tunay M. Kilolu ve obez kadınlarda grup görüşmelerinin vücut ağırlığına, iyilik haline ve sağlık denetim odağına etkisi (Uzmanlık tezi). Adana, Çukurova Üniversitesi, 2015.)
Tables:
1. Tables should be written on a separate page with a single line spacing.
2. Each table should have number and descriptive information above it.
3. If abbreviations are given in the table, these abbreviations can be defined as subtitles under the table and alphabetical order.
4. When previously printed or electronically published tables are used, written permission must be obtained from both the author and the printer and this must be sent to the editor of the journal by fax or mail.
5. Transverse and longitudinal lines should not be used in the table, only a straight line should be drawn at the top and bottom.
6. Tables should not be repeated in the text.
7. Tables should not be placed in writing.
8. Tables should be in the file to which each post is sent to a table.
Figure Graphic Pictures and Subtitles:
1. Subtitles should be written on a separate page with two lines spaced apart.
2. Numbered according to the order in the text and abbreviations in figures, graphics and pictures, abbreviations should be placed in the alphabetical order below the subtitle.
3. Tables, figures and graphics should not be placed in the writing.
4. Magnification ratio and staining technique should be explained in microscopic pictures.
5. When using previously printed or electronically published figures, graphics and illustrations, written permission must be obtained from both the author and the printer, and should be sent to the editor of the journal by fax or post.
6. Written permission must be obtained when using the images of the persons to be recognized.
7. The explanations of the figures should be written at the end of the file to which the manuscript is sent.
8. Table, figure and graphs should be mentioned in the text.
9. The pictures / photos should be colored, the details should be clearly visible and clear.
10. Figures, pictures / photos are separate. jpg file should be added to the system.
11. Image and photo files should not be less than 100 pixel / inch, 8 cm wide and 300dpi.
Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
In terms of scientific publishing standards, the articles to be submitted should be prepared in accordance with the criteria of the International Medical Journal Editors Board (ICMJE), Publication Ethics Committee (COPE).
https://publicationethics.org/files/Full_set_of_flowcharts_Turkey_2017%20%281%29.pdf
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html
• The articles to be submitted must comply with research and publication ethics. The responsibility of the articles belongs to their authors.
• Articles should not have been published anywhere before and / or should not be in the evaluation process for publication.
• In order for the evaluation process to begin, the articles must be submitted with the Copyright Transfer Form signed by all authors. For author ranking, the signature order in the Copyright Transfer Form is taken into consideration.
• Corresponding author bears the responsibility of the final version of the article on behalf of all authors.
Ethical Responsibility
• Compliance with the Helsinki Declaration Principles (https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/) is sought in all studies involving the element of "Human". In such studies, the authors should state that they carried out the study in accordance with these principles in the MATERIAL AND METHODS section, and that they received approval from the ethics committees of their institutions and "informed consent" from the people who participated in the study.
• If the item "Animal" is used in the study, the authors should be informed in the MATERIAL AND METHODS section of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use- of-laboratory-animals.pdf), they should state that they protect animal rights in their work and that they get approval from the ethics committees of their institutions.
• In case presentations, "informed consent" should be obtained from the patients.
• Ethics committee approval information should be stated in the MATERIAL and METHODS section, together with the name, approval date and number of the committee.
• If there is a direct-indirect commercial connection or financial support institution in the study, the authors; used commercial product, drug, company, etc. They should indicate to the editor on the presentation page that they have no commercial relationship with or what kind of relationship (consultant, other agreements) they have.
• Authors are responsible for reporting all personal and financial relationships related to the study. It must be clearly declared whether there is any conflict of interest associated with the application and / or evaluation of the article.
• The authors are responsible for the compliance of the articles with scientific and ethical rules.
1. Authors
Authors must comply with all authorship policies and conflict of interest statements detailed in Sections IIA and B of this document.
These are called predatory journals because of the rapidly increasing numbers of journals called 'scientific journals' but that publish all the posts for a fee without any screening for profit. It has become more important to maintain some standards in scientific journalism. For this reason, our journal follows the recommendations of organizations such as ICMJE, COPE and WAME and complies with the standards.
2. Journals
a. security
Manuscripts submitted to journals are privileged communications that are the private, confidential property of the author, and authors can be harmed by premature disclosure of any or all the details of a manuscript.
For this reason, editors should not share with anyone other than the authors and reviewers whether it has been handled and reviewed, its content and status in the review process, including the reviewers' critique and eventual fate. Requests from third parties to use reviews in manuscripts and legal proceedings should be politely refused, and editors should do their best not to provide such confidential material as subpoenas.
Editors should also make it clear that the reviewers must keep the manuscripts, related materials, and information they contain strictly confidential. Reviewers and editorial staff should not publicly discuss the author's work, and reviewers should not endorse the ideas of the authors prior to publication. Reviewers should not keep the article for their personal use and should destroy the hard copies of the articles and delete the soft copies after submitting their reviews.
When an article is rejected, it is best practice for journals to delete copies from their editorial systems unless local regulations require retention. Journals that maintain copies of rejected manuscripts should disclose this practice in the Authors' Notice.
When an article is published, journals should retain copies of the original submission, review, revision, and correspondence for at least three years, and possibly permanently, depending on local regulations, to answer future questions about the work.
Editors should not publish reviewers' comments without the permission of reviewers and authors. If journal policy will protect authors against the reviewer's identity and comments are not signed, that identity should not be disclosed to the author or others without the express written consent of the reviewers.
Confidentiality may need to be breached if fraud or alleged fraud is present, but editors notify authors or reviewers of their willingness to do so, and confidentiality should be honored otherwise.
b. Timing
Editors should do their best to ensure that manuscripts are processed in a timely manner with the resources available to them. If editors are going to publish an article, they should try to do it on time and planned delays should be negotiated with the authors. If a journal has no intention of continuing an article, editors should try to reject the article as soon as possible to allow the author to submit it to a different journal.
c. Peer Review
In the Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, each article is evaluated by at least 2 reviewers.
The peer review process is double blind.
Randomly selected samples are examined by an independent organization in each issue. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/dergi/detay/2338/cukurova-anestezi-ve-cerrahi-bilimler-dergisi
The journal stores all referee evaluations digitally and can submit them for review by relevant institutions at any time.
Reviewers are announced on the website at the end of each issue and in the full presentation of the issue.
Peer review is a critical evaluation of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not usually part of the editorial staff. Peer review is an important extension of the scientific process, as impartial, independent, critical evaluation forms the core of all scientific work, including scientific research.
The true value of peer review is debated, but the process facilitates a fair hearing for an article among members of the scientific community. More practically, it helps editors decide which articles are appropriate for their journal. Peer review often helps authors and editors improve the quality of their reporting.
It is the editor's responsibility to ensure that reviewers have access to all material related to the review of the manuscript, including additional material for email-only, for selection of appropriate reviewers, and to ensure that reviewer reviews are appropriately evaluated and interpreted in context.
A peer-reviewed journal is not obligated to submit articles submitted for review and is not obligated to follow up on reviewers' suggestions, positive or negative. The editor of a journal is ultimately responsible for the selection of all content, and editorial decisions may be made aware of matters unrelated to the quality of a manuscript, such as journal relevance. An editor may reject any article at any time, including after it has been accepted when concerns about the integrity of the work arise.
Journals may differ in the number and types of articles they submit for review, the number and types of reviewers they seek for each article, whether the review process is open or blind, and other aspects of the review process. For this reason, and as a service to authors, journals should publish a description of the peer review process.
Journals should ultimately review their decision to accept or reject a paper and acknowledge the reviewers' contribution to their journals. Editors are encouraged to share reviewers' comments with reviewers of the same article so that reviewers can learn from each other during the review process.
As part of peer-review, editors are encouraged to review research protocols, statistical analysis plans if separate from the protocol, and/or contracts related to project-specific studies. Editors should encourage authors to make such documents public at the time of or after publication before accepting such work for publication. Some journals may require these documents to be publicly posted as a condition of their acceptance.
Log requirements for independent data analysis and availability of publicly available data were published during this revision; this reflects evolving views on the importance of data availability for pre- and post-publication peer review. Some journal editors currently request statistical analysis of trial data by an independent biostatistician before accepting studies for publication. Others encourage or request authors to share their data with others for review or reanalysis, while others indicate whether study data may be used by third parties for viewing and/or reanalysis. Each journal should establish and publish its own specific requirements for data analysis and registration in a place easily accessible to potential authors.
Some people believe that true scientific peer review only begins when a paper is published. In this regard, medical journals should have a mechanism for readers to submit comments, questions or criticisms on published articles, and authors should respond appropriately and cooperate with requests for journal data or request additional information regarding the paper. occurs after publication (see Chapter III).
d. Integrity
Editorial decisions should be based on the relevance of a manuscript to the journal and its contribution to the evidence for its originality, quality, and important questions. These decisions should not be influenced by business interests, personal relationships, or agendas, or by findings that are negative or credibly question accepted wisdom. In addition, authors should submit for publication or make it publicly available, and editors should not consider publication, exclude studies with findings that are not statistically significant or have inconclusive findings. Such studies may provide evidence that evidence pooled with other studies through meta-analysis can still help answer important questions, and public recording of such negative or inconclusive findings may prevent unintended duplication of effort or other researchers considering similar studies. can be valuable to
Journals should clearly outline the appeals process and have a system in place to respond to appeals and complaints.
e. Journal Metrics
Journal impact factor is widely misused as a proxy for research and journal quality and as a measure of the benefits of research projects or individual researchers, including their eligibility for recruitment, promotion, hiring, awards, or research funding. The ICMJE recommends that journals reduce the emphasis on impact factor as a single measure, instead offering a set of articles and journal metrics related to their readers and authors.
3. Reviewers
Manuscripts submitted to journals are privileged communications that are the private, confidential property of the author, and authors may suffer from early disclosure.
Therefore, the reviewers should keep the articles and the information they contain strictly confidential. Reviewers should not publicly discuss the author's work and properly write down the authors' ideas before the article is published. Reviewers should not keep the article for their personal use and should destroy the copies of the articles after reviewing them.
Reviewers are expected to respond promptly to review requests and submit reviews within the agreed timeframe. Reviewers' comments should be constructive, honest, and polite.
Reviewers must declare conflicts of interest and withdraw themselves from peer review if there is a conflict.
Plagiarism policy
The journal ’‘Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences’’ are committed to publishing only original material, i.e., material that has neither been published elsewhere, nor is under review elsewhere.
The journal ’‘Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences’’ uses software to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts: Manuscripts in which plagiarism or textual borrowings are found without reference to the original source are rejected by the editorial board for publication in the journal.
The journal ’‘Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences’’ will judge any case of plagiarism on its own merits. If plagiarism is detected, either by the editors, peer reviewers or editorial staff at any stage before publication of a manuscript - before or after acceptance, during editing or at page proof stage, we will alert the author(s), asking her or him to either rewrite the text or quote the text exactly and to cite the original source. If the plagiarism is extensive - that is, if at least 25% of the original submission is plagiarized - the article may be rejected and the author's institution/employer notified.
Policy of checking for plagiarism
The manuscripts in which plagiarism is detected are handled based on the extent of plagiarism present in the manuscript: if < 25% plagiarism – the manuscript is immediately sent back to the authors for content revision, and if > 25% plagiarism – the manuscript is rejected without editorial review. The authors are advised to revise the plagiarized parts of the manuscript and resubmit it as a fresh manuscript. The percentage of plagiarism is calculated by software and also assessed manually.
Plagiarism after publication
If plagiarism is detected after publication, the Journal will conduct an investigation. If plagiarism is found, the journal editorial office will contact the author's institute and funding agencies. The paper containing the plagiarism will be marked on each page of the PDF. Depending on the extent of the plagiarism, the paper may also be formally retracted.
Recommendations for avoiding plagiarism
Use quotation marks around words taken verbatim from a source Change no part of quotation within the context of the sentence Use single marks for a quotation within a quotation Use ellipses (a space and three periods) for a part of the quotation omitted. Use brackets around added words Limit the use of direct quotes
Attempt to paraphrase the information, or summarize the information derived from a variety of sources using own words.
Authors are responsible for obtaining copyright permission for reproducing illustrations, tables, figures taken from other authors and/or source. Permission must be placed at the foot of each figure.
Some authors have written several chapters for several different books that are changed only slightly. Each manuscript is copyrighted when published. Because the author no longer owns the rights to these words, one should not plagiarize them. Most editors and reviewers would argue that self-plagiarism is unethical. Thus, an author cannot copy one’s own material for a new manuscript without permission of the copyright holder. Alternatives include using quotes around short phrases of own work and citing appropriate references.
Price Policy
There is no APC for authors who submit their manuscripts to Journal of Çukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences.
